Hi Alessandro,
I suggest you look through the official archived record of the emails
concerning these issues. I would start with
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/email/archives/200902/msg00026.html
I would not want to paraphrase or risk misquoting anyone's messages.
There were, I believe a couple of messages prior to this that could
be useful for understanding the situation.
Cheers,
Rex
At 8:30 AM -0500 2/20/09, Alessandro Triglia wrote:
>Could someone please explain why they see a conflict of interests
>here? Whose interests are deemed to be in conflict, and how
>exactly might that affect the content and the progression of the
>specification(s)?
>
>Alessandro
>
>
>
>
>From: Renato Iannella [mailto:]
>Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 20:25
>To:
>Cc:
>Subject: Re: [emergency] FEMA IPAWS Note on CAP Profile
>
>
>On 20 Feb 2009, at 05:12, Dwarkanath, Sukumar - INTL wrote:
>
>>It is FEMA's responsibility to publish its standards and protocols.
>> FEMA will consider and adjudicate the OASIS IPAWS CAP Profile as
>>appropriate in preparation for its adoption of standards and
>>protocols for the Next-Generation EAS. FEMA recognizes that the
>>FCC's 2nd R&O does not require standards and protocols to be
>>published at this time regarding security, multiple languages,
>>alerts & warnings of special needs communities, or of video media
>>types. Hence, we feel that it is reasonable to consider adopting
>>the OASIS IPAWS CAP Profile as part of its pending standards and
>>protocols. Note, however, in accordance with statements made
>>publicly, that FEMA intends on pursuing the development of
>>additional requirements to address any outstanding issues for
>>NG-EAS systems.
>>
>
>Interesting comment; "FEMA will consider and adjudicate the OASIS
>IPAWS CAP Profile"....
>
>Let me ask this rudimentary (if not controversial :-)
>question....why is there an IPAWS CAP profile being developed by
>OASIS?:
>
>As a national profile - it should be the responsibility of FEMA (or
>whoever is the responsible party in the USA) and if you need it
>"standardised", then take it to NISO.
>
>My recommendations to EMA (here in Australia) was for the AU CAP
>Profile to be created and managed by EMA and, if necessary, taken to
>"Standards Australia" for formal adoption.
>
>I don't think there is any other OASIS standard that is specific to a country?
>
>
>
>Cheers... Renato Iannella
>NICTA
--
Rex Brooks
President, CEO
Starbourne Communications Design
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
Berkeley, CA 94702
Tel: 510-898-0670
