← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

FW: IPAWS Profile Discrepancy

From
Gilmore, Timothy <>
Date
2010-03-09T17:10:24+00:00
ID
Thread
FW: IPAWS Profile Discrepancy
All,

I wanting to thank everyone for their input on this issue and also want
to pass along more information on it:

The difference between a Standard and a Profile notwithstanding, the
specific point is that the IPAWS Profile *document* (any of the
documents under
http://docs.oasis-open.org/emergency/cap/v1.2/ipaws-profile/v1.0/) 

and the IPAWS Profile *schema*
(http://docs.oasis-open.org/emergency/cap/v1.2/ipaws-profile/v1.0/pr02/c
apv1.2-ipaws-profile-v1.0-pr02.xsd) don't match.  

The documents indicate that <info> is optional, but the schema indicates
that it is required.


Timothy D. Gilmore | SAIC
Senior Test Engineer | ILPSG | NIMS SC | NIMS STEP
phone: 606.274.2063 | fax: 606.274.2025
mobile: 606.219.7882 | email:   
Please consider the environment before printing this email.


-----Original Message-----
From: Gilmore, Timothy 
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 8:32 AM
To: 
Subject: IPAWS Profile Discrepancy

All,

One of our engineers wanted me to pass along some information about
another IPAWS Profile issue:

CAP 1.2 specifies that the <info> element is optional (presumably, a
"cancel," "update," "error," or "acknowledgement" alert could use the
<references> element to specify a previous alert), and the IPAWS Profile
document doesn't say otherwise.  The IPAWS Profile *schema*, however,
makes the <info> element *required*.

Which is correct? 

Thanks,

Timothy D. Gilmore | SAIC
Senior Test Engineer | ILPSG | NIMS SC | NIMS STEP
phone: 606.274.2063 | fax: 606.274.2012
mobile: 606.219.7882 | email:   
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread