RE: *****SPAM***** Re: [emergency] HAVE Conformance vs. Documentation vs. Released Schemas

Thanks

 

Not quite sure exactly what you mean by structure, but it 
sounds like it will not accept anything that doesn't have elements with values 
specific to these concerns. This contradicts the line that says takes any valid CAP 
message.

 

However, I have no problem with IPAWS-OPEN doing 
that at all. I also no problem with IPAWS-OPEN requiring my Canadian 
Structure before accepting my CAP and forwarding.

 

What I need to stress is that if indeed it is only open to 
these "structures" then it can't be truly said to be accepting any valid CAP message. It can 
though be said to be accepting of any CAP IPAWS message 
(if indeed those structures are defined in IPAWS).

 

Thanks

 

Norm

From: Gary Ham [mailto:] 

Sent: March 9, 2010 3:52 PM
To: Paulsen,Norm 
[Ontario]
Cc: McGarry, Donald P.; David RR Webber (XML); 
; Dwarkanath,Sukumar - INTL
Subject: 
*****SPAM***** Re: [emergency] HAVE Conformance vs. Documentation vs. Released 
Schemas

I cannot speak details for IPAWS specifically, because not all 
aspects have been built or even designed, but I can give some general direction. 
IPAWS-OPEN (yep 3.0 will be called IPAWS-OPEN) is planned to have a single CAP 
input interface that takes any valid CAP message.  Depending on content 
(does it have the appropriate CMAS structures, EAS structures, NWEM structures, 
etc), user permissions, and user direction, it will be made available to 
multiple other networks, gateways, interoperating systems, push capabilities, 
etc., as applicable.  Data driven, as simple as possible, as complex as 
necessary. That is the goal. 

R/s

Gary