> For CAP:
> For example, consider the <circle> element. Is the following a
> "correct" <circle> element?
> <circle> 0, 0, 150000000 </circle>
This is invalid according to CAP.
> It certainly fits the descriptions in that element's comments: (1) it's
> in the form "latitude, longitude, radius"; (2) the central point
> conforms to WSG84; (3) the radius value is expressed in kilometers; and
That is not what the CAP spec says, this language is coming from the EDXL-DE spec and they differ on this element, which if is unintentional, needs to be corrected.
--
--
