RE: [emergency] Deadline Expired: Review results and next steps: gmlSF, CIQ, and Common Types profiles

Title: RE: [emergency] Deadline Expired: Review results and next steps:  gmlSF, CIQ, and Common Types profiles

Ok, Tim

I'll request a 7-day electronic ballot for each document separately, as soon as they are posted.

Werner

-----Original Message-----

From: Timothy Grapes [mailto:]

Sent: Tue 4/12/2011 5:10 PM

To: ; 

Subject: [emergency] Deadline Expired: Review results and next steps:  gmlSF, CIQ, and Common Types profiles

All,

The deadline for comments to these components expired on April 5.  Since

that date a few comments are being addressed and coordinated.  Status and

next steps were discussed on three calls today:  1- An ad-hoc cross-SC

meeting followed by 2- The EM-TC meeting, and then 3- a call with the Natl

Weather Service to discuss inputs to "weather" elements/structure.

Each component author (CIQ, gmlSF and common types) understands the final

changes and coordination required for completion.  Upon completion, each of

these three will individually posted.  At that point, the intention is

request an electronic vote for each individually. 

My question is, as each of the three documentation sets are completed and

posted ready to vote, can we have one person (Werner?) perform the actual

electronic request for vote?  Please let me know what you think.

.         Rob will plan to complete the ICS form example within one week

from today (April 19)

.         Our plan for immediate common types (and SitRep) submission is to

have "weather" in common types simply reflected  as  two string elements,

"Weather concerns" and "

o   In parallel with SitRep submission into public comment # 1, we will

determine specific weather elements and structure for incorporation into a

revision of the common types. 

o   During SitRep public comment, a comment will be submitted regarding

breaking "weather" out into distinct components

o   The goal is to have the "weather" requirement completed by the time the

SitRep public comment #1 time-frame is completed.

Please let me know if I have missed or misrepresented anything.

Thanks,

    Tim

Tim Grapes

Evotec

(703) 304-4829

From: Timothy Grapes [mailto:]

Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 11:54 PM

To: ; 

Subject: [emergency] Deadline for review/comment to gmlSF, CIQ, and Common

Types profiles

All,

The purpose of this message is to request OASIS EM-TC review and comment to

the following draft specifications, and to convey the deadline for providing

your input and comments.  The DEADLINE for review and submission of comments

will be on or before COB Tuesday, April 5.  Generally, the EM-TC

subcommittees across the EM-TC have participated in this temporary

committee, and thus have participated in development and/or review of the

process and draft deliverables to date.

Please submit your comments through the specific OASIS folder were each

profile document is currently maintained below. 

This is generally an informal process within the EM-TC, which provides

re-usable components maintained within the RIM structure in support of full

EDXL standards produced and published by OASIS.  The process of making

changes forward is reasonably nimble, requiring only the EM-TC agreement for

such changes.

The latest meeting of a temporary OASIS cross-subcommittee group was held at

11:00 PM EST time today.  The purpose of this group is to focus on and

facilitate completion of commonly required components supporting the

EDXL-SitRep, DE 2.0 and HAVE 2.0.  The three supporting components now

requiring review include:

CIQ (stored in IF-SC, Requirements folder):

(spec)

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency-if/download.php/41649

/edxl-ciq-v1.0-wd01-JW-2.odt.

(schema)

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency-if/download.php/41657

/CIQ_Profile_Schema.zip

NOTE 1:  This still must be copied over to the formal template recently

provided to OASIS.  Please comment on the content provided.

NOTE 2:  You will notice additional data dictionary rows/annotations.  These

will not be included in the final version, and simply note attributes

currently in CIQ that will not be in included in the profile for comparison

Common Types (IF-SC, Requirements folder):

(spec)

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency-if/download.php/41441

/edxl-ct-v1.0-wd01-JW-3.odt

(schema)

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency-if/download.php/41442

/EDXL_Common_Types_ver04.xsd

Simple Features (GIS-SC, Specifications folder):

(spec)

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency-gis/download.php/4163

0/edxl-gsf-v1.0-wd01-LEL-v0.2.odt

(schema)

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency-gis/download.php/4163

1/edxl-gsf.v0.0.xsd

NOTE 1: In addition to incorporation of comments received, this profile will

then require one additional week to coordinate through our OASIS - OGC

channel (Carl Reed) to ensure accurate profiling and inclusion of any

dependent objects required for this stand-alone profile.

Sincerely,

Tim Grapes

Evotec

(703) 304-4829

From: Timothy Grapes [mailto:]

Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 11:40 AM

To: 

Subject: [emergency] OASIS common types, CIQ and SF update

All,

We conducted our call today with the following members.  The recent postings

by Robin Covers was noted, but these are not the actual templates to be used

as expected.  Werner Joerg has the action to check with Robin on target

date.

At the moment, we are using the template that Jeff had started with in order

to move forward with the content.  Once the formal templates are received

we'll have to port over the content. 

The group reviewed the status of each of the deliverables.  Request that all

members please review available drafts and provide either comments or your

"OK".

1.       Jeff:  CIQ draft was posted for review early this morning.

2.       Jeff: Common Types draft has been published for review and was

discussed on the previous call.

3.       Lew:  Gml SimpleFeatures document and profile is targeted for draft

distribution and review by the end of this week

SitReps outstanding items:

1.       Don:  All examples are ready except "remarks" and "estimated" are

still to be added with select elements.

2.       Rob T. agreed to work development of the ICS 209 example this week.

Rob T.

Don M.

Lew L.

Tim G.

Rex B.

Tom F.

Werner J.

Thanks,

    Tim

Tim Grapes

Evotec

(703) 304-4829

"A good plan, violently executed now, is better than a perfect plan next

week"

- General Patton