I agree with you, Tim,
Cheers,
Rex
On 8/9/11 2:14 PM, Grapes, Timothy wrote:
Folks,
My
input on the 2 ICS-209 elements in red:
1. Field 8 “Percent
contained” “Completed”
a. I feel we should simply
keep our schema as is and populate only “Percent contained”
in the example form. All definitions I had read (and we
adopted in the data dictionary) specified that “contained”
and “completed” were synonymous. This is the first I have
noticed this 209 form field laid out that way – seems
confusing to me.
2. Field *15: Primary
Location, Organization, or Agency Sent To
a. The early decision was that
the “sent to” requirement here is met by and mapped to the
EDXL-DE “recipientRole”. I suggest we leave this field in
the example blank for the moment and run this through public
comment. However, in order to meet the ICS need, we
probably should plan to add this element to the SitRep
schema.
Question
for Don: How about the resources matrix under field 49?
Was that simply an effort issue to come up with example data
to populate a handful of rows?
Thanks,
Tim
Tim Grapes
SE Solutions, Inc.
(703)
304-4829
From: McGarry,
Donald P. [mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 9:56 AM
To: Grapes, Timothy;
Subject: RE: Reminder: 11:00 Sitreps 800-320-4330
PIN# 663210
I
just uploaded a draft of the ICS209 form that matches the
version 7 schema. We can discuss today. I may be 5 min
late but will be on.
-Don
703-595-9375
From: Grapes,
Timothy [mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 8:45 AM
To:
Subject: [emergency] Reminder: 11:00 Sitreps
800-320-4330 PIN# 663210
800-320-4330 PIN# 663210
Thanks,
Tim
Tim Grapes
SE Solutions, Inc.
(703)
304-4829
