Re: Oracle NIEM Video Kerfuffle

Hi David,

    

    Work on HAVE 2.0 is underway, but in hiatus until after SitReps 1.0
    and DE 2.0 have been worked through to Public Review, currently held
    up in overtaxed TC Admin. I'm copying the TC list with this reply in
    order to pass your reply along to those who have been concerned.

    

    Cheers,

    Rex

    

    On 8/2/11 8:44 PM, David RR Webber (XML) wrote:
    
        
Rex,

        

        

        
It's purely illustrative - for demonstration purposes -
          hypothetical - assuming someone wanted to add additional
          Aircraft information using NIEM dictionary components - this
          could be how to do it.  

        

        

        
Obviously there are many improvements that could be made to
          HAVE to make it more flexible, more aligned to NIEM, lessons
          learned from Haiti, and the list goes on.

        

        

        

        
My membership of HAVE at OASIS is still caught up in Oracle
          bureaucracy - so its going to be several weeks more before I
          can rejoin the list and comment.

        

        

        
I suggest people just relax until then.

        

        

        
BTW - is there new work on HAVE in progress?  I cannot
          "see" anything right now - as I'm not on the TC list.

        

        

        

        
Thanks, DW

          

        

        
          

            -------- Original Message --------

            Subject: Oracle NIEM Video Kerfuffle

            From: Rex Brooks <>

            Date: Tue, August 02, 2011 12:33 pm

            To: "David RR Webber (XML)" <>

            

            Hi David,

            

            I don't know if you are associated with the video on the oracle.com
            

            site: http://launch.oracle.com/?NIEM
            but it is causing a problem with 

            the EM TC because the end product breaks the EDXL-HAVE
            specification, 

            and while I am not the person to speak with, I said I would
            borach the 

            topic with you. I'm not working on HAVE so I haven't
            followed this, but 

            it should be dealt with through OASIS and NIEM. The TC is
            moving to do 

            this, so at least now you know.

            

            Cheers,

            Rex