Next in thread →
Next in month →
Re: RE: [emergency] EDXL Video - TC Review
Btw- HAVE is not edxl either
Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android
From:
Aymond, Patti <>;
To:
Camille Osterloh <>; <>; <>;
Subject:
RE: [emergency] EDXL Video - TC Review
Sent:
Fri, Mar 8, 2013 3:36:50 PM
This is very well done. I have a few minor suggestions:
· CAP name is Common Alerting Protocol. It is not EDXL-Common Alerting Protocol.
· The process description should be in present tense rather than past tense since it is a process that we continue to use.
· It would be nice to make the connection between EDXL-HAVE and the HHS HAvBed system.
· EDXL-SitRep Expected timeframe should be updated since Q4 2012 has passed.
Thanks for putting together such a clear and comprehensive EDXL overview.
Patti
Patti Iles Aymond, PhD
Senior Scientist, Research & Development
IEM
8550 United Plaza Blvd. Suite 501
Baton Rouge, LA
70809
(225) 526-8844
From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of Camille Osterloh
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 5:39 AM
To: ;
Subject: [emergency] EDXL
Video - TC Review
TC members, The EDXL Video was approved this week by the Collateral and Documents SC and is available for TC review. We welcome feedback from both the EM-Adoption TC and Emergency Management-TC members.
The video is posted to Kavi:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency-adopt-docs/download.php/48218/latest
Note it is a large file (~80 MB) so it may take a few minutes to download. Please provide any comments to the list by March 19th. As always, we appreciate your input.
Thank you! -Camille
Next in thread →
Next in month →