RE: [energyinterop] RE: Initial Port of OpenADR to EnergyInterop

From
Dinges, Sharon <>
Date
2009-07-21T13:14:06+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [energyinterop] RE: Initial Port of OpenADR to EnergyInterop
Toby,

 

I believe this is a fair assessment.  The interactions 
between the EMS and the external ESI are more appropriately communicated using 
XML and web services.  

 

Then, at the EMS level, the systems would communicate using 
BACnet, LonWorks, OPC, HAN, DALI, etc.

 

Regards,

Sharon

From: Considine, Toby (Campus Services IT) 
[mailto:] 
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 
20:40
To: 'Edward Koch'; 
''
Subject: [energyinterop] RE: 
Initial Port of OpenADR to EnergyInterop

In terms of the smart grid 
diagrams,  outside communications should be with Energy Services Interface 
(ESI), which is something different than the Energy Management System (EMS). 
Makers of BACnet, LON, HAN, DALI, et al will each figure out what the middle 
layer is.  Oft times, the enterprise will be in between the ESI and any 
EMS. It certainly will be in any industrial environment…

 

BACNET, LON and friends are out 
of scope…

 

 

 

"A man should never be ashamed 
to own that he has been in the wrong, which is but saying ... that he is wiser 
today than yesterday." -- Jonathan 
Swift

  
  

    
      
Toby 
      Considine

      
Chair, OASIS oBIX 
      TC
Facilities Technology Office
University of North 
      Carolina
Chapel Hill, NC

    
      
  

    
      
Email: Toby.Considine@ unc.edu
Phone: 
      (919)962-9073 

      
http://www.oasis-open.org 
      

      
blog: 
      www.NewDaedalus.com

 

 

From: Edward Koch 
[mailto:] 
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 8:41 
PM
To: Considine, Toby (Campus Services IT); 
''
Subject: RE: Initial Port of 
OpenADR to EnergyInterop

 

Enclosed is a pass on the 
document that Toby sent out.  I mostly tried to answer some of his 
questions and added some comments of my own.  

 

Here are some general 
comments:

 

It looked like there is some 
material missing at the end.  

 

Clearly there needs to be some 
verbiage added concerning security requirements.  

 

There needs to be some meat 
added for the interaction and data models.  Perhaps adding in some of the 
diagrams from the spec will fulfill this requirement.

 

We need to give some thought to 
what we are going to do with the various interfaces, i.e. BACnet versus REST 
versus SOAP, etc.

 

 

-ed koch

 

 
The information contained in this message is privileged and intended only for the recipients named. If the reader is not a representative of the intended recipient, any review, dissemination or copying of this message or the information it contains is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender, and delete the original message and attachment..