To Michel's point, I think there is interest in changing the schema in a few ways. Bill advocates making those changes "in public" by revising after the first committee draft is published. (If I understood him correctly.)
That is really question number one: does this first draft include any significant changes to OpenADR?
On the enumerations, I advocate an interger state value that is defined in the specification. This is simpler for an embedded controller to handle. We should also consider backward compatibility.
Regards,
Dave
Dave
Sent from my mobile device
