RE: [energyinterop] Not To Exceed

I don’t know if it has to be one or the
other, but it is clearly an EITC thing if it involves load profiles.

 

 

-ed koch

 

 

From: Toby Considine [mailto:] On Behalf Of Toby
 Considine

Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010
8:43 AM

To: ;


Subject: [energyinterop] Not To
Exceed

 

DR
– and Verification, and Verification is the conundrum. Verification is the
problem because DR are is a promise to reduce load by a certain amount from an
uncertain beginning end point to an unknown end point.

 

What
about an agreement that “I will use no more than xxx” as a DR offering. It
becomes entirely results oriented (good for a service). It would be more
valuable if it warranted “no spikes” rather than merely total use for a [15
minute] period. It certainly would be callable.

 

Do
we adopt this? If so,  does it look like

 

[emix
– this is for max use]

 

Or
does it look like

 

[Eitc:
I will commit not to exceed

   
[emix]

]

 

In
other words, is max an EITC or EMIX thing…

 

tc

 

"Energy and persistence conquer all things." --
Benjamin Franklin 

 

  
  
Toby Considine

  TC9, Inc

  
OASIS
  Technical Advisory Board

  TC Chair: oBIX & WS-Calendar

  
TC Editor: EMIX, EnergyInterop

  
  
  
  

  
  
  
Email:
  

  
Phone:
  (919)619-2104

  
http://www.tcnine.com/

  
blog:
  www.NewDaedalus.com