Re: [energyinterop] RE: EI feedback

From
William Cox <>
Date
2011-04-29T15:22:29+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [energyinterop] RE: EI feedback
I think the issue is lower level - do you an open loop or a closed
    loop system? 

    

    The OpenADR Feedback mechanism (adapted with appropriate standards
    use for PAP03 and PAP04 in EiFeedback in Energy interoperation) does
    that loop-closing with the ability to set one time or periodic
    response schedules.

    

    I think that's what Dave is getting at.

    

    Thanks!

    

    bill

    --

    
William Cox
      

      Email: 
      

      Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com
      

      +1 862 485 3696 mobile
      

      +1 908 277 3460 fax
    

    

    On 4/29/11 10:46 AM, Old, Bob wrote:
    
      
      
      
      
      

        
I
            guess I don’t understand the question.  But that hasn’t
            stopped me before from putting in my 2 cents.

        
 

        
I
            thought the CSP’s earned their profit by buying curtailment
            in the retail market and selling it at a profit into the
            wholesale market.   I think you folks should visit the Board
            of Trade in Chicago and learn how the big boys do it.  
            Don’t forget to bring your checkbooks.  

        
 

        
And
            don’t worry, it’s not as wild and wooly as it used to be. 
            They’ve stopped dropping truckloads of corn on the unlucky
            speculator’s front lawn in suburban Highland Park.

        
 

        
Best,

        
B.O. 
            April 29, 2011

        
 

        

          
Robert
              Old

          
Siemens
              Industry, Inc.

          
Building
              Technologies

          
1000
              Deerfield Pkwy.

          
Buffalo
              Grove, IL 60089-4513

          
Tel.:
              +1 (847) 941-5623

          


          
usa.siemens.com/buildingtechnologies

        

        
 

        

          

            
From: Holmberg,
                David [mailto:] 

                Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 8:27 AM

                To: 'Gowri, Krishnan';
                

                Subject: [energyinterop] EI feedback

          

        

        
 

        
Just a note—I
          was looking at a recent PJM white paper on price responsive
          demand:

        
http://pjm.com/~/media/documents/reports/pjm-whitepaper-on-price-responsive-demand.ashx

        
 

        
PJM is stressed
          about not being able to correctly model price responsive
          demand (PRD) and thus wants info back from the customer. From
          page 11-12 I quote (and have highlighted what they expect from
          the facility). This is the only place I know where I have seen
          written down a request for feedback in some format. The PRD
          Provider would be someone like an ESP or CSP.

        
 

        
“In real-time operations, it is
            essential to understand how much energy will be consumed at
            or above various prices so that PJM can send out the proper
            price and dispatch signals to market participants to
            maintain energy balance and reliability. Without this
            information PJM may be in a position of ―over- or
            under-dispatching‖ resources, rather than
            dispatching the amount necessary to maintain energy balance.
            The
              PRD curves submitted by the PRD Provider, which include
              price-quantity pairs, enable short-term load
            forecasting to account for reactions to dynamic retail
            rates. The below figure illustrates what such a PRD curve
            might look like. PJM
            Staff Whitepaper Price Responsive Demand March 3, 2011 DOCS#
            591114 PJM © 2011 Page 12

        
 

        
 

        

        
 

        
David Holmberg

        
NIST
          Engineering Laboratory

        
301-975-6450