RE: [energyinterop] CS Ballot Motion

In case we started the voting:

 

I vote ‘yes’.

Rolf  

 

From:  [mailto:] On Behalf Of Considine, Toby (Campus Services IT)
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 9:01 AM
To: 'EITC'
Subject: RE: [energyinterop] CS Ballot Motion

 

No objections and a yes vote.

 

"It is the theory that decides what can be observed."   - Albert Einstein

Toby Considine

Chair, OASIS oBIX Technical Committee
U.S. National Inst. of Standards and Tech. Smart Grid Architecture Committee

Facilities Technology Office
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, NC

  

Email: Toby.Considine@ unc.edu
Phone: (919)962-9073 

http://www.oasis-open.org 

blog: www.NewDaedalus.com

 

 

From:  [mailto:] On Behalf Of Thomas, Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 1:22 PM
To: William Cox; EITC
Subject: RE: [energyinterop] CS Ballot Motion

 

No objections

 

Thanks,

 

Chuck Thomas

Office: (865)218-8031

Cell: (865)384-8578



 

From:  [mailto:] On Behalf Of William Cox
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 1:36 PM
To: EITC
Subject: [energyinterop] CS Ballot Motion

 

Though a TC request or motion is not necessary to complete the CS process on the errata, given the TC discussions,  I make the following motion under the TC standing rules:

I move that the chairs be directed to submit the completed errata CSPRD04 as publicly reviewed to TC Admin to create a Special Majority Ballot for Committee Specification.

Is there a second?

Are there any objections?

Thanks!

bill cox

-- 
William Cox 
Email:  
Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com 
+1 862 485 3696 mobile 
+1 908 277 3460 fax