← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

Energy Interoperation Public Review - proposed comment resolution - any objections?

From
William Cox
Date
2014-05-07T15:59:00+00:00
ID
Thread
Energy Interoperation Public Review - proposed comment resolution - any objections?
EITC

--
We've finished the public review in the OASIS Standard process.
One comment received a few hours in advance of the formal public
review period:
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/energyinterop-comment/201401/msg00000.html
I agree that the comments are non-substantive. Though they arrived
before the start of the Public Review, we should address them -- and
the reference update will improve the specification.
It would be ideal if the  reference correction  process applied to
OASIS standards (pre-publication) but so far as I know something
like that is proposed but not effective. So here's the draft
response:
Planned response:
We agree that these non-substantive changes improve the
specification by updating references. The Technical Committee agrees
that these will be addressed through the non-substantive change
process in TC Process  https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/tc-process#errata
.
Discussion:
If you object to this response, please reply to the list right
away or call the chairs.  We will notify TC Admin to start the
ballot after submitting this comment log.
We plan to start the formal ballot the start of next week (May 13).
As this specification is intended to be submitted to the IEC in the
near future, we may defer the errata process as it can only be done
once in any six month period; we have also requested that the
reference update request process available for OASIS Committee
Specification Publication be applied in this case, possibly after
pending OASIS Board action on process evolution.
Thanks!
bill

--
William Cox
Email:  
Web:  http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com
+1 862 485 3696 mobile
+1 908 277 3460 fax
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread