Makes some sense to me, but not all CTS-supporting markets are
electricity markets.
Having the capability of describing Hz and voltage is important,
but it can be in the marketContext (per market) or product
definition (per product) where electricity is the resource.
The choice of the TE user would be at the market level for Toby's
suggestion, at the product level in the initial proposal. I
suspect this would be a configuration, not an operational change.
But we need to consider non-electricity markets. I doubt that Hz
is meaningful in water or natural gas markets, so would this be a
cached-in-market-context approach?
Thanks!
bill
On 3/18/21 9:18 AM, Considine, Toby
wrote:
The original EMIX was imagining a global market-place, where 220
V power and 110V power might coexist in the same market. It
really walked past DC microgrids entirely, which have been
growing in import, largely through the efforts of the E-Merge
alliance. Frequency is one of the attributed communicated.
Try as I might, I cannot think of a CTS market in which European
Power and North American power coexist. I cannot see AC and DC
in the same CTS market.
I would like to make these attributes part of the market
context, and exclude them from the individual product
definitions. This would simplify the CTS product descriptions
(Everything in this market is for 110 volt power. or 220, and
all is DC). Any comments?
tc
--
William Cox
Email:
Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com
+1 862 485 3696 mobile
