Hi Norm and John;
I have missed on the beginning of that thread!
Is it accurate to understand "widget" as standing for any
URI/URN/namespace/system call ?
Regards,
DavidL
John Cowan <> on 11/28/2000 11:17:55 AM
To:
cc: (bcc: David Leland/LONDON/FINANCIAL
TIMES)
Subject: Re: Proposed URI classes
Norman Walsh wrote:
> Are you suggesting that the content model for <catalog> should
> be completely open?
>
> <catalog>
> <system source="xxx" target="yyy"/>
> <public source="xxx" target="yyy"/>
> <widget source="xxx" target="yyy"/>
> </catalog>
No, actually I suggest
<catalog>
<remap type="system" source="xxx" target="yyy"/>
<map source="xxx" target="yyy"/>
<remap type="widget" source="xxx" target="yyy"/>
</catalog>
--
There is / one art || John Cowan <>
no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein
*********************************************************************
* Please visit the web site of the Financial Times at: *
* http://www.ft.com *
* *
* For UK personal finance, please visit http://www.ftyourmoney.com *
* *
* This E-Mail is intended for the use of the addressee only and may *
* contain confidential information. If you are not the intended *
* recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination *
* of this communication is strictly prohibited. *
* If you receive this transmission in error, please notify us *
* immediately then delete this E-Mail. * *
* *
* *
*********************************************************************
