/ John Cowan <> was heard to say:
| > > Maybe just 'import'. (The semantics of the CATALOG directive are more
| > > like xsl:import than xsl:include.)
| > >
| > > Yes, I think I vote for 'import' all by itself.
| >
| > Works for me.
|
| Umm. Isn't it the case that the referenced catalog is not searched
| unless the current catalog does not satisfy the request? This seems
Yes.
| to me like subclassing (the current catalog is a subcatalog of the
| referenced catalog), the Java term for which is "extend". That's
| what I had in mind.
But the semantics of xsl:import happen to match as well, which is how
I got there. That is, if an XSLT processor finds a matching template
in the current stylesheet, it does not search imported stylesheets.
| How about "subCatalogOf"?
I think I'd prefer extend :-)
Be seeing you,
norm
--
| Everything we love, no doubt, will pass
XML Technology Center | away, perhaps tomorrow, perhaps a thousand
Sun Microsystems, Inc. | years hence. Neither it nor our love for it
| is any the less valuable for that
| reason.--John Passmore
