Re: problem with the spec

On 1 Aug 2001, Norman Walsh wrote:

> / Paul Grosso <> was heard to say:
> | Despite my earlier yes vote, Rob Lugt has just raised an issue [1]
> | that now has me changing my vote to NO.
> 
> Formally, I suppose I must do the same. I vote NO.
> 
> | I would like us to change the spec to use the longest rewrite entry
> | in the current catalog entry file.  Norm has said he will plan to
> 
> I've already made the change on the assumption that it will be
> uncontroversial.
> 
> | make that change to the draft.  Then I'd like to ask that we have
> | our telcon this coming Monday where we can vote on the new draft
> | in real time.  I hereby make this suggestion to the chair.
> 
> Seconded. I'll post a revised draft today.

The chair agrees with this notion and thereby calls a meeting for 
next Monday to finalise the specification. Any objections to making 
this change should be raised in email before the Monday meeting.


Lauren