RE: 24th FWSI TC Meeting Feedback

Title: Message

Hi 
Viren

Thanks 
for the feedback, will incorporate when I update the working draft. 

 

Also, 
as discussed during the meeting, whether Crimson is comfortable in incorporating 
the cross-protocol transformation for Service Router. Hope you can let us know 
soon, so that I can work on that with your side if so.

Rgds

-ps-

  

  
-----Original Message-----
From: Viren Baraiya , 
  Maganlal [mailto:] 
Sent: Friday, November 25, 
  2005 1:27 PM
To: Tan Puay Siew
Cc: 
  
Subject: 24th FWSI TC Meeting 
  Feedback

  

  
Hi,

  
 

  
Our feedback on the last FWSI 
  meeting:

  
 

  
1)       
  The current use cases for Service 
  Router FE only includes the setup part (manage services, servers and 
  handlers).  But the runtime scenarios are missing. Specifically the 
  exception scenario where the client invokes a web service and the service is 
  unavailable.

  
2)       
  It would be good if incase the 
  producer sends an exception, the exception can be routed to a functional 
  handler which an in-turn do some logging /notification of the error before 
  forwarding it back to the calling client. (Allowing a separate handler chain 
  to be invoked incase of exception/fault sent by the 
  producer)

  
3)       
  It is not specifically mentioned 
  that functional handlers used within the service routers can be functional 
  elements itself.  We proposed TC to add this information in the 
  definition of the functional handler in the document. (that the functional 
  handlers can be a functional element itself)

  
 

  
 

  
Viren 
  Baraiya

  
Software 
  Engineer

  
DID: 65 – 6887 
  7526

  
Fax: 65 – 6778 
  5277

  
 

  
 

  
CrimsonLogic 
  Pte Ltd  

  
(Regn 
  No: 198800784N)

  
31 Science Park 
  Road, The 
  Crimson, Singapore 
  117611

  
Main Tel: 65 - 6887 
  7888  

  
Main Fax: 65 - 6778 
  5277

  
Visit us at www.crimsonlogic.com

  
Makes 
  better sense