Matt,
I agree May will be too far for the f2f. We can do March if there
are no major objections and beat the spring break season.
Regards,
Anil
On 02/08/2011 11:10 AM, Matt Rutkowski wrote:
> IMO, the month of May seems a bit far out for a F2F in order to progress
> the draft use case doc. Not sure who else is going to IETF in Prague, but
> still viable to hold coincident with IDTrust (perhaps 2 days following
> instead of before) or permit remote attendance for travel weary IETF
> attendees? Otherwise, I prefer moving up in March and see what progress
> we can make given the sheer numbers of use cases we have now.
>
>
>
>
> Anthony Nadalin<>
> 02/08/2011 10:48 AM
>
> To
> David Turner<>, ""
> <>
> cc
>
> Subject
> RE: [id-cloud] Face to Face Meeting initial brainstorm
>
>
>
>
>
>
> That will be tight for folks going to IETF, would suggest a different
> week. The other option is to hold it in conjunction with the IIW meeting
> in Mountain View in early May
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Turner [mailto:]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 7:23 AM
> To:
> Subject: RE: [id-cloud] Face to Face Meeting initial brainstorm
>
> FYI, IETF 80 in Prague, Czech Republic is Mar 27 - Apr 1.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darran Rolls [mailto:]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 9:04 AM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [id-cloud] Face to Face Meeting initial brainstorm
>
> IDTrust is April 6-7, so would mean meeting Monday 4th and Tuesday 5th ?
>
> On 2/8/11 6:36 AM, Barbir, Abbie wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Colin Wallis [mailto:]
>> Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 10:44 PM
>> To: 'Anil Saldhana';
>> Subject: RE: [id-cloud] Face to Face Meeting initial brainstorm
>>
>> If it were April, many folks on this list might be heading to IDTrust at
> Gaithersburg so may be shift it to the DC area..?
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Anil Saldhana [mailto:]
>> Sent: Tuesday, 8 February 2011 4:19 p.m.
>> To:
>> Subject: Re: [id-cloud] Face to Face Meeting initial brainstorm
>>
>> Darran,
>> holding f2f meetings at hotels is quite challenging given the wifi
> situation. Hence we figured out during the last f2f that a corporate
> location may be ideal given the possibility of having decent wifi, that
> does not cost $400-500 per day.
>> The f2f will be in April (given Feb is RSA conf month and March is
> Spring Break month).
>> Regards,
>> Anil
>>
>> On 02/07/2011 05:37 PM, Darran Rolls wrote:
>>> I'd like to propose Austin as a venue - I don't think we could host
>>> the group at our facility BUT we could likely sponsor a room at near
>>> by hotel.
>>>
>>> I'd suggest two days. Roughly when in the calendar are we talking
>>> about? I recall someone mentioning the week of March 7th or 21st...
>>>
>>> Darran
>>>
>>> On 2/7/11 12:54 PM, Anil Saldhana wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> I just want to run this brainstorming thread on the list to
>>>> solicit your opinion before we create the online polls.
>>>>
>>>> We need to have a face to face meeting (similar to the successful 1
>>>> day f2f meeting at Washington,DC in Sep2010).
>>>>
>>>> Location:
>>>> (Please suggest your location if you are able to host the f2f
>>>> meeting at your corporate location).
>>>>
>>>> Number of days:
>>>> Minimum 2 days.
>>>>
>>>> So please reply with your opinion on the number of days that we
>>>> should hold the f2f meeting and you are able to host.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Anil
