Thinking further, I think it makes sense to remove the meetings from
the online calendar system. We can still have the meetings to
discuss gap analysis outside of the regular TC meetings.
On 07/27/2011 03:49 PM, Anthony Nadalin wrote:
If
there is a vote to change the meeting schedule to have
additional TC meetings, these can be run as non-quorum
meetings since no business is being done at these meetings,
but a side effect is they would could disrupt member’s
voting status which may not be a good thing.
From: Anil Saldhana
[mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 1:45 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [id-cloud] IDcloud informal
recurring meeting on Gap Analysis
Shall we just convert these into TC
meetings since they affect the deliverables? That will
maintain the IPR rules.
On 07/27/2011 03:04 PM, Anthony Nadalin wrote:
Just
to be clear, this is not an OASIS meeting and should be
removed from the our TC calendar and left as a request for
people wanting to talk about the subject to join a call with
the specific details
From: Gershon
Janssen [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 12:57 PM
To:
Subject: [id-cloud] IDcloud informal recurring
meeting on Gap Analysis
L.S.,
As agreed during our last TC meeting, I
setup a weekly recurring IDcloud informal meeting for
discussing the Gap Analysis, starting this Friday (29 July) @
2 PM ET.
This meeting is considered as an informal
meeting and does not count towards voter eligibility.
Kind regards,
Gershon Janssen
