We have a test project called Siena in which John Borras and Gershon Janssen are involved, as I mentioned at the very beginning of this thread. Their contribution is "mediated" by AFNET (our French correspondent) so that their travel expenses can be paid. But they do not get compensated beyond that - that's what Gershon told me. This project might be different, I have no idea. I'm not sure how much input STORK wants; but the real point is that they may consider standardizing the security aspects or messaging in OASIS, following in the footsteps of PEPPOL. That is our end game. I hope this clarifies. On 5/13/2011 10:07 PM, James Bryce Clark wrote: > +1 to Pim, and I expect Laurent may wish to have a look at the referral terms to our French correspondent. J >
> Sent from my mobile >
> On May 13, 2011, at 12:41 PM, "Pim van der Eijk"<> wrote: > >> >> When the EU Commission project officer for STORK learned >> about BDX, he told me it could be a model for STORK, so it >> is good that this is opportunity is now arising. The STORK >> SAML profile is based on earlier input from ENISA and >> related work on e-authentication in Europe. This work was >> presented to the Security Services TC in 2007 and at an >> OASIS Fall conference in London. >> >> The request for OASIS to participate in projects to provide >> expertise has come up many times in the past but there was >> no formal framework to support this model. Recently, OASIS >> has set up a relation with a not-for-profit organization in >> France which is able to act as legal entity in EU contracts >> and would be able to subcontract any experts work. Since >> this relation is now established (and to be announced soon), >> we should use this structure to support this. >> >> Pim >> >>
