Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: RSA server

From
Bruce Rich <>
Date
2011-02-04T21:16:00+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: RSA server
Larry, the time* labels were in the use-case
 document.  I don't have the slides, so don't know if they appear there
 or not...

 Bruce A Rich
 brich at-sign us dot ibm dot com
From:
    <>
To:
    <>,
 Bruce Rich/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
Cc:
    <>,
 <>, Gordon Arnold/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, John
 Peck/Endicott/IBM@IBMUS, <>, <>,
 <>, <>,
 <>, <>, <>,
 <>
Date:
    02/04/2011 03:06 PM
Subject:
      RE: [kmip-interop-tech]
 interop use case variant

Sounds ok. What is time3
 and time4? I was going by the interop slide deck. Maybe I missed it.

There are some custom attributes
 used also, but I don ??t know if they are in the realm of this use case.

Larry H
From:  Feather, Stan S [
mailto:
]

 Sent:  Friday, February 04, 2011 1:28 PM
To:  Bruce Rich; Hofer, Larry
Cc:  ; ; Gordon Arnold; John Peck;
 Clark, John (Atalla); ; ;
 Hofer, Larry; ; ; ;
 
Subject:  RE: [kmip-interop-tech] interop use case variant



Bruce ??s suggestion seems
 like the clearest way.  Add a sentence to the description stating
  that 3.1.3 can  also be applied when the key pre-exists on the
 server, by omitting the steps at  time0, time3, and time4.



Stan
From:  Bruce Rich [
mailto:
]

 Sent:  Wednesday, February 02, 2011 4:03 PM
To:  
Cc:  ; ; Gordon Arnold; John Peck;
 Clark, John (Atalla); ; ;
 ; ; ; ;
 Feather, Stan S; 
Subject:  Re: [kmip-interop-tech] interop use case variant



Larry,

 Interesting question.

 So your scenario is to just do time 1 (Locate by Name) and time 2 (Get
 symmetric key) interactions from use case 3.1.3?  Since it requires
 out-of-band setup on the server, it doesn't fit real well in the use cases,
 which tend to do all the setup and teardown as part of the use case.  Perhaps
 it might do to document it as 3.1.3.time1 and 3.1.3.time2?  Just a
 suggestion.  Any opinions from the rest of y'all?

 Bruce A Rich
 brich at-sign us dot ibm dot com
From:          <>
To:          <>,
 <>, <>
Cc:          Bruce Rich/Austin/IBM@IBMUS,
 Gordon Arnold/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, John Peck/Endicott/IBM@IBMUS, <>,
 <>, <>, <>,
 <>, <>,
 <>, <>
Date:          02/01/2011
 06:38 PM
Subject:          [kmip-interop-tech]
 interop use case variant

 Hello all,
 Should we add this variant to the KMIP use case 3.1.3 in the interop slide
 deck? It is a minor variation from 3.1.3 so don ??t know the best way to
 document it.


 We use the KMIP OASIS Use Case 3.1.3 to get a key from a server

             Key is created by server.

             Client performs a Locate operation,
 supplying the Name, to which the server responds with the Unique Identifier
 of the created key.
             The client retrieves the created
 key using its Unique Identifier


 Regards,
 Larry H
Next in thread → Next in month →