Attached is a draft Cryptsoft Statement of Use for KMIP 1.1 for review. Could each vendor mentioned in the statement of use confirm that the statements being made match their understanding particularly the following two statements: The Cryptsoft KMIP client has successfully been used in interoperation with the Cryptsoft KMIP server and with KMIP server implementations by IBM, SafeNet, Thales and Quintessence Labs. KMIP client implementations by HP, IBM, NetApp, SafeNet, Thales and Quintessence Labs have successfully been used in interoperation with the Cryptsoft KMIP server. One item that isn't clear is whether or not listing the testing that used KMIP 1.0 is appropriate for a statement of use (although the statement remains strictly correct in its current wording). The conformance clauses in the profiles are something that you will each need to check carefully to be able to make a statement of use. We had to implement a couple of additional capabilities in the Cryptsoft servers to be able to meet the conformance clauses of a number of the profiles as the set of test cases we have currently do not cover all the conformance clauses across all the profiles. Separately if any other vendor is interesting in testing TLSv1.2 interoperability support please let me know as we have not enabled TLSv1.2 on the interop servers as yet (those are separate systems). Thanks, Tim.
Attachment:
SOU-Cryptsoft-19-Jun-2012-draft1.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
