We have collated the results from the July testing using the following approach: 1) if any vendor indicates an issue, that issue is noted as accepted unless a majority of other vendors disagree with the result 2) where insufficient results were gathered no results are reported Overall we have more functionality demonstrated as interoperable across the vendors participating and that's great to see. Thanks to everyone for the efforts invested in testing. Given that we did not complete enough independent test runs with our C# client SDK we have removed it from the results for this round. There are a number of non-conformance issues noted against the Cryptsoft Java server which were not resolved during the test period (most of those are directly part of attribute index handling issues). When an update is available we will announce that to the list so re-testing can be performed. The non-compliant NetApp result (now split into four test cases) related to Object Group and templates and will be part of further discussions related to templates - however servers which treat an Object Group registered in a template structure as applying to the template itself are non-conforming as Object Group is explicitly noted in 2.2.6 and this is the consensus interpretation between vendors and reflected in the majority of implementations. We may not yet have consensus on what GET on a template returns - but we do have a clear majority on how Object Group is handled. The Quintessence server had a number of updates during the testing and the testing reports are mixed so a consensus view from the test reports has been used. As always, any errors in merging the results should be noted quickly. I would like to get this report out to the wider TC group next week along with another summary report updating the last one from the face to face. Thanks, Tim.
Attachment:
KMIPInteropResults-Jul2012-MASTER_v1.1-combined.xls
Description: MS-Excel spreadsheet
