So what is the purpose of the last two graphs? They provide no meaningful additional information. They are completely redundant. They appear, in my opinion, to present an alternative view of the same results in a manner
that can be easily mis-interpreted, or mis-represented.
John
On 20/2/19, 10:07 pm, " on behalf of Tim Hudson" <
on behalf of
> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 9:58 PM John Leiseboer <
> wrote:
I don t think changing the labels makes the graphs any less misleading. Graphs 1 and 2 present exactly the same information and are more than sufficient.
John
I don't see how you can simultaneously claim the graphs are misleading
and that they contain exactly the same information as two graphs that are not misleading.
That position is simply not tenable.
The graphs are completely accurate and represent the activity in the testing and are based on results we have all confirmed are accepted as accurate.
For people that don't read the graph titles and the labels, or elect to read things out of context, Tony has updated the labels to make it clear what number of products are including in the total test results.
Tim.
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service for QuintessenceLabs Pty Ltd.
______________________________________________________________________
