← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Inconsistencies for review
Hi folks, With no remaining unverified or disputed results left - we just need to focus on the inconsistencies. For the most part, we look for tests where we have mostly failures and a single pass (or sometimes the inverse) in the context of similar capabilities in similar tests. Below is the list of items I'd like to look into. They results may well be accurate and have a good reason for the difference, however I's ask the applicable folks to check their records and ensure these are accurate. Use the [Test Report] > [Review Failed] options to isolate these items quickly. Review items - QS M 1 20 - TTLV - Fortanix > IBM - Inconsistent Fails & Passes need to be checked - QS M 2 20 - TTLV - Fortanix > IBM - Inconsistent Fails & Passes need to be checked - TC CERTATTR 1 20 - TTLV, HTTPS, JSON, XML - Qlabs > IBM - Inconsistent Fails & Passes need to be checked - TC OFFSET 2 20 - TTLV - Fortanix > IBM - Inconsistent Fails & Passes need to be checked - QS M 1 21 - TTLV - Fortanix > IBM - Inconsistent Fails & Passes need to be checked - QS M 2 21 - TTLV, HTTPS, JSON, XML - QLabs > IBM - Inconsistent Fails & Passes need to be checked - TC CERTATTR 1 21 - TTLV, HTTPS, JSON, XML - QLabs > IBM - Inconsistent Fails & Passes need to be checked - TC DIGESTS 1 21 - TTLV, HTTPS, JSON, XML - QLabs > IBM - Inconsistent Fails & Passes need to be checked - TC DLOGIN 1 21 - TTLV, HTTPS, JSON, XML - QLabs > IBM - Inconsistent Fails & Passes need to be checked - TC I18N 1 21 - XML - QLabs > IBM - Inconsistent Fails & Passes need to be checked - TC I18N 2 21 - XML - QLabs > IBM - Inconsistent Fails & Passes need to be checked - TC I18N 3 21 - XML - QLabs > IBM - Inconsistent Fails & Passes need to be checked - TC OFFSET 1 21 - TTLV - Fortanix > IBM - Inconsistent Fails & Passes need to be checked We'll go over this list in tomorrow's call prior to signing off the results. Thanks again, -Tony
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread