Next in thread →
Next in month →
Asymmetric Key Profiles and Associated Proposed Changes to KMIP
Judy, On #3 - you're right. One #1 - I was actually suggesting replacing Transparent RSA public/private key with Raw/PKCS1. I can't see an entity that generates their own key pair converting from what the defacto output is to the KMIP format. But, I'm not going to fall on my sword on this, as there may be from scratch implementations do. spt wrote: > Sean > > I've incorporated your proposed changes in the revision of the Basic > Asymmetric Key Profiles document that I just posted with one noted > exception. > > Ref Change 3 below -- This was for the Basic Asymmetric Key Foundry and > Server profile where no certificates are generated. Therefore I did not > add X.509 as a Key Format Type. > > Judy > >
Next in thread →
Next in month →