Re: [kmip] Cryptographic Services Proposal - Next Steps

On 16/11/2012 23:10, Kelley Burgin wrote:
> I'm interested in a "get random" operation since it's needed for the
> current attested get proposal, and I'm willing to contribute towards
> this.

Kelly, your requirements are already covered in the cryptographic
services proposal.
John is talking about an  entirely different set of capabilities - none
of which are required or necessary for your use case.

Tim.