RE: suggested motion on approving the KMIP V1.1 Differences as Committee Note

From
Griffin, Robert <>
Date
2013-05-30T19:54:03+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: suggested motion on approving the KMIP V1.1 Differences as Committee Note
Hi again –

 

Here’s the TC process section on announcing Committee Notes:

 

After approving a Committee Note, a Technical Committee may notify the TC Administrator for publishing the Committee Note to the OASIS Library and announcing its publication to the OASIS membership.

 

Regards,

Bob

 

From: Griffin, Robert 
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 9:50 PM
To: 
Subject: suggested motion on approving the KMIP V1.1 Differences as Committee Note

 

Hi –

 

Since the KMIP V1.1 Differences doc is non-standards track, we have the option of a very simple approach to making it a Committee Note (from the TC Process):

“Non-Standards Track Work Products may directly be approved as Committee Notes by the Technical Committees via a Full Majority vote.  Public reviews are optional for Committee Notes”.

We could do this by voice vote, but I think it probably is better to have a ballot so that voting members not in the call have a chance to participate in the ballot. So I suggest we consider something like this in today’s TC call:

“(name) moves that the co-chairs create a 10-day Full Majority Vote ballot to approve ”KMIP V1.1 Differences wd02” asa  Committee Note and request the co-chairs to submit a request for OASIS to publish this Committee Note.”

 

Regards,

Bob