Hi Anthony
I do not agree that the semantics of the Unique Batch Item ID could not / should not be changed to support enhanced logging. That said, I do agree with John Leiseboer that there is no need for a Response Correlation.
Regards,
… Dave
From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of John Leiseboer
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 3:23 AM
To: Anthony Berglas;
Subject: RE: [kmip] Groups - Client / Server Correlation Value uploaded
HI Anthony,
The changes are an improvement. I don’t see a need for the ResponseCorrelation value though. If the RequestCorrelation value is present in the Request message and the related Response message, that should be sufficient to correlate the request with the response in both client and server logs. What need do you see for having both correlation values in the Response message? If the one correlation value is sufficient, then maybe it could be renamed MessageCorrelation value or something similar?
John
From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of Anthony Berglas
Sent: Wednesday, 16 December 2015 5:27 PM
To:
Subject: [kmip] Groups - Client / Server Correlation Value uploaded
Submitter's message
This update incorporates feedback from Sue G, Bruce R, David F and Mark J.
-- Anthony Berglas
Document Name: Client / Server Correlation Value
Description
Proposal to enhance communication between the client and server.
Download Latest Revision
Public Download Link
Submitter: Anthony Berglas
Group: OASIS Key Management Interoperability Protocol (KMIP) TC
Folder: Proposals
Date submitted: 2015-12-15 22:26:55
Revision: 1
The information contained in this electronic mail transmission
may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected
from disclosure. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer without copying
or disclosing it.
