Next in thread →
Next in month →
RE: [kmip] Groups - Proposal for Cryptographic Usage Mask Attribute uploaded
What is the call in information for today’s meeting? James "Randall" Crossland, CISSP NGMS Cyber CoE/IA CoP Lead UAL311/2108 301 Voyager Way, Huntsville, AL 35806 Phone: 256.830.3565 Cell: 256.683.8239 From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of Furlong, Judith Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 2:09 PM To: Nitin Jain <>; Subject: EXT :RE: [kmip] Groups - Proposal for Cryptographic Usage Mask Attribute uploaded Nitin, Thanks for posting these slides. I’ve amended the agenda to add your name to this topic (along with Tim H) and you can present the proposal to the TC today. I will make a couple of comments on the proposal now: Traditionally more detailed usage information such as how to use an attribute like Cryptographic Usage Mask has been put in the KMIP Usage Guide vs the KMIP Spec itself. For example, take a look at section 3.26 of the KMIP 1.4 Usage Guide. This section provides more information on the intended use of the Cryptographic Usage Mask. So we can discuss on the call today whether to add the proposed table to the Spec or the Usage Guide. As to the content of the table itself – some changes will be necessary since some of the descriptions are not quite accurate or only cover one (of two) potential uses – For example crlSign is not just that the key can be used to verify a CRL (the public key case), but it can also be applied to the private key used to sign the CRL. Content Commitment is used to prove non-repudiation (only the entity signing something is in possession of the private key) -- sure you verify a digital signature to prove this, but we will need to augment the description to differentiate it from Verify. Judy Judith Furlong Sr. Consultant Product Security Architect Dell EMC | Product Security Office Office: +1-508-249-1124 From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of Nitin Jain Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 2:37 AM To: Subject: [kmip] Groups - Proposal for Cryptographic Usage Mask Attribute uploaded Submitter's message Currently in KMIP spec usage masks are not briefed clearly under Cryptographic Usage Mask attribute. This Proposal will be helpful to understand the usage masks with example. -- Mr. Nitin Jain Document Name: Proposal for Cryptographic Usage Mask Attribute Description Currently in KMIP spec usage masks are not briefed clearly under Cryptographic Usage Mask attribute. This Proposal will be helpful to understand the usage masks with example. Download Latest Revision Public Download Link Submitter: Mr. Nitin Jain Group: OASIS Key Management Interoperability Protocol (KMIP) TC Folder: Proposals Date submitted: 2018-01-10 23:36:44
Next in thread →
Next in month →