← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
Fwd: [kmip-comment] TTLV vs XML Encoding
Hi Folks,
Here is the response that Chuck & I have drafted.
Please review in preparation for discussion on our next call.
"The purpose of the test cases is to clearly document how the
KMIP standard can be used in real-world contexts.
Test cases are designed to be able to be developed well
prior to implementations existing so that concepts can be
discussed within the technical committee by all participants.
The XML format was selected because it is human readable
and also able to be easily automated for those who have
implementations.
This results in more test cases and more interactions
within the technical committee during the standards process.
The encoding rules for TTLV, XML and JSON are all clearly
documented within the KMIP standard (in the KMIP Profiles
document) and testing the correctness of an implementation for
following the encoding rules is not the focus of the test cases.
We have interoperability and plug-fest events for testing
correctness of implementations which cover a much broader scope
than the simple encoding rules."
Thanks,
-Tony Cox
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject:
[kmip-comment] TTLV vs XML Encoding
Date:
Fri, 7 Jun 2019 09:18:23 +0000
From:
Pawlitzek René <>
To:
<>
CC:
<>
Hi everyone
I haven’t been following
the KMIP standardization process closely in the past.
However, recently I looked at the use-cases document and
noticed that the test cases no longer list the TTLV
encoding. Would it be possible to provide the TTLV encoding
for the test cases in addition to the XML-encoding? This
would help people to update older KMIP encoders / decoders
to version 1.4. Thank you very much.
Rene
-----
Prof. René Pawlitzek
Dozent für Informatik
Interstaatliche
Hochschule für Technik Buchs NTB
Werdenbergstrasse 4
CH-9471 Buchs
Tel: ++41 81 755-3183
Fax: ++41 81 756-5434
http://www.ntb.ch
http://inf01-server.ntb.ch:8080/NTB/
(intern)
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →