I finally figured out what is confusing me in this example - it is the appearance of [Violation] instead of [Reparation].
On slide 23, Shouldn't it be
rep1: [Reparation] ps1, pen1
rep2: [Reparation] ps1, pen2
Similarly on slide 26
It is interesting how the alternatives for penalty propagates into (implicit?) alternatives for the reparation - we should mention that somehow.
Tara
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 7:03 AM, monica.palmirani <> wrote:
Dear LegalRuleML members,
please find in attachment the slides for the LegalRuleML tutorial in RuleML2014 Symposium.
Best regards,
Monica Palmirani
--
===================================
Associate professor of Legal Informatics
School of Law
Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna
C.I.R.S.F.I.D. http://www.cirsfid.unibo.it/
Palazzo Dal Monte Gaudenzi - Via Galliera, 3
I - 40121 BOLOGNA (ITALY)
Tel +39 051 277217
Fax +39 051 260782
E-mail
====================================
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
