Re: [legalxml-courtfiling] JXDDS Person Object

From
Rolly Chambers
Date
2002-09-23T13:51:00+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [legalxml-courtfiling] JXDDS Person Object
MHonArc v2.5.2 -->

legalxml-courtfiling message

[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]

Subject: Re: [legalxml-courtfiling] JXDDS Person Object

From: Rolly Chambers <>

To: "Rowley, Moira" <>,"John M. Greacen" <>,Court Filing List <>

Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:46:05 -0400

Title: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] JXDDS Person Object

It is the semantics. It sounds like the clear consensus is for "party" to 
have the more limited meaning of "party to a case" rather than a broader 
meaning. I definitely agree that "party" should have the more limited meaning it 
customarily receives in court proceedings.

 

As for a term to describe the broader meaning, I have no 
preference between "actor" or "participant". I confess to being unclear about 
the benefit or need for a single high level element like "actor" or 
"participant."

 

Rolly