MHonArc v2.4.5 -->
legalxml-courtfiling message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [legalxml-courtfiling] Contribution from OXCI project
From: Rolly Chambers <>
To:
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 19:44:48 -0500
Title: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Contribution from OXCI project
Jim and others -
Thanks for the informative responses. It is good to get a clearer
picture of what the OXCI Architecture includes and what it does not.
From my perspective, it would be great if the baseline OXCI Architecture
was extended to include service of filings (and documents that are required to
be served but not filed) on other parties. Roger Winters made the
point (better than I did) that including such functionality is important to
gaining law firm participation in e-filing. If moving the
baseline isn't practical, then it would be prudent to describe how the
baseline Architecture can be extended to provide "service of filings"
functionality.
As for the CF XML schema, I'm now a little unclear about its intended
purpose. If it is a "demonstrator" not intended for use, I agree that it is a
good illustration of how the CF 1.1 DTD might be translated into an XML
schema. If it is intended for use, however, I think the "XML namespace" and
the "ANY content - XML schema wildcard" issues ought to be cleared up. Use
of enumerated element values and data typing certainly can wait until the later
CF schema is created, although implementing those features need not lead to any
incompatibility between the proposed XML schema and the CF 1.1
DTD.
At any rate, what you have put together in the paper is excellent. I join
in John Messing's "well done."
Rolly Chambers
