RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Information about the GJXDM

MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

legalxml-courtfiling message

[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Information about the GJXDM

From: "Poindexter, Gary" <>

To: "Electronic Court Filing Technical Committeee" <>,<>

Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 23:20:25 +0100

My interpretation of the documentation provided on
the referenced page is that the requirement is not simply "...required to use
the gjxdm..." "Compliance" as defined on the same page includes how the
schemas will be constructed using the subset generation tool and extended using
the documented "rules" (presumable DTDs are not "compliant"). I'm
interested in knowing if others agree or disagree with my interpretation of
the definition and if you agree, how you feel about this
definition of compliance.

 

gary
poindexter

BearingPoint