MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
legalxml-courtfiling message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [legalxml-courtfiling] "Must vote" for TC voting members
From: Jim Beard <>
To: Electronic Court Filing Technical Committeee <>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:59:08 -0800
John and Others,
I would imagine you are correct that the holidays played a major roll in the lack of voting. Having said that however, after reviewing the attached documents for the subcommittees I was left a little confused.
My understanding is that the Requirements Subcommittee is responsible for developing use cases, a glossary, service descriptions of messaging components, definitions of messaging profiles, and GJXDM compliant schemas. While the Court Filing Blue Drafting subcommittee will simply review what the other subcommittee produces. Is this a correct understanding of the situation? If so why is there a need for the CFBlue subcommittee. Shouldn't the entire TC be reviewing what the requirements subcommittee produces?
Thanks,
Jim
On Jan 4, 2005, at 11:01 AM, John Greacen wrote:
John M. Greacen
Greacen Associates, LLC
HCR 78, Box 23
Regina, New Mexico 87046
505-289-2164
505-289-2163 (fax)
505-780-1450 (cell)
�
<Court Filing Blue Drafting Subcomm charter 2d draft.doc><Requirements Subcomm charter 2d draft.doc>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/legalxml-courtfiling/members/leave_workgroup.php.
Jim Beard
counterclaim.com, Inc
http://www.counterclaim.com
http://openefm.sourceforge.net
(800) 264-8145
References:
"Must vote" for TC voting members
From: "John Greacen" <>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
