MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
legalxml-courtfiling message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Revised list of comments
From:
To:
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:58:54 -0700
John, and members,
We cannot work our way through 70
comments during today's meeting.
For example, a few of Rex's
comments would require more discussion than we have time
for.
I suggest, instead, that we try to get agreement on
a few overall issues:
(1) I do not think this work-product
is not yet as good as it should be...
I feel, at this point, we are
still at the beginning of our discussions - not anywhere near the
end.
I feel that this document can be made MUCH better and DESERVES much stronger buy-in from our
members.
More time and more iterations
are in order.
Since I do not fully understand the
implications of moving forward with an immature work-product, I can only look to
you for advice in this area.
Perhaps, there will remain plenty of
time for further discussions and revisions as we move
on.
If so, then, ok. Let's move on - and let the discussion
continue.
If not - if the version
we choose to move forward with needs to initially be 'very good', then:
I don't
think we are there yet.
Is there anyway we can buy more time
to work on it? (even if we must
select another person to 'drive' the process harder).
(2) If we are to immediately move-forward with
this version of the work-product (plus/minus minor revisions) them, I suggest that we should get rid of the
sections that are the least solid or comfortable
to our members.
To me, that would be the sections
describing 'MDE' interaction...
...that section is,
more-or-less, akin to a technical specification, and needs more
development before we release it.
The MDE section has lots of functional stuff in it too
- which should be pulled out and incorporated into the Use Case
section.
Also,
the sections regarding eService (which is almost exclusively described in the
MDE sections) are not ready.
Though
the last round of discussions were full of detail and were very productive,
overall, there has been very little discussion about this very
critical process.
It's simply not ready
yet.
- Shane Durham
LexisNexis FileAndServe
From: John Greacen [mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 9:05 AM
To: 'Electronic Court
Filing Technical Committeee'
Subject: [legalxml-courtfiling] Revised
list of comments
I just received Rex McElrath’s
comments – one general and twenty more specific comments.
I attach a revised list,
incorporating those comments. They are italicized for those of you who
have the time to quickly go through the new list and review Rex’s
input.
There are now 70 specific comments
for review and decision.
John M.
Greacen
Greacen Associates,
LLC
HCR 78,
Box 23
Regina,
New Mexico 87046
505-289-2164
505-289-2163
(fax)
505-780-1450
(cell)
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
