RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Second unresolved agenda item

From
James Cusick
Date
2005-05-31T13:48:00+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Second unresolved agenda item
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















legalxml-courtfiling message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Second unresolved agenda item




From: "Cusick, James" <>
To: <>,"Electronic Court Filing Technical Committeee" <>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 09:48:22 -0400









Just a question on the use of the term "fragment", do we 
mean to suggest that an incomplete XML document could be transmitted? would that 
be ill formed? jc


  
  
  From: John M. Greacen 
  [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 6:47 
  PM
To: Electronic Court Filing Technical 
  Committeee
Subject: [legalxml-courtfiling] Second unresolved agenda 
  item


  
  
  Please post your comments by nest 
  Tuesday on the following architecture for the Court Filing Blue message 
  structure proposed by Scott Came.
  
  
  
  
  John 
  M. Greacen
  Greacen 
  Associates, LLC
  HCR 
  
  
  505-289-2164
  505-289-2163 
  (fax)
  505-780-1450 
  (cell)
  
  












[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]