MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
legalxml-courtfiling message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [legalxml-courtfiling] Second unresolved agenda item
From: "Dallas Powell" <>
To: <>,"Electronic Court Filing Technical Committeee" <>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 17:51:40 -0600
It is my understanding that we have agreed
that the standard is not restricted to one specific Communication layer.
With that in mind, we should take the SOAP Message Package out of
the discussion. I also believe in previous discussions that we
agreed to allow the documents to be embedded in the body or to be
included as attachments such as that which is defined below. I would
anticipate that there should be two diagrams depending on which one an
implementation desires otherwise we are binding ourselves to require the SOAP
messaging layer as identified in your diagram.
Also, from my previous message I believe that
the standard clearly needs to define version controls which I think should
reside in the SOAP Header area. The standard also needs to define how that
process works with intermediary nodes.
Dallas
