← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

Record Docketing and Callbacks

From
James Cabral
Date
2005-06-29T05:25:00+00:00
ID
Thread
Record Docketing and Callbacks
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















legalxml-courtfiling message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Record Docketing and Callbacks




From: "Cabral, James E." <>
To: "Electronic Court Filing Technical Committeee" <>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 22:22:58 -0700









Everyone,
 
Tom Clarke and Scott Came are currently working on 
defining the domain models and GJXDM mappings for the Record Docketing and 
callbacks.  In the attached email discussion of the content of each 
message, I identified two questions for the TC.  I referenced the second 
issue in the "Proposed Service Model for ECF 3.0" document because it relates to 
the service model . But the first issue is a possible simplification of all the 
callbacks that I do not recall we have decided as a TC.
 
Again, please direct your comments to the entire TC so 
that we may resolve these issues as soon as possible.
 
  
thanks,

Jim 
Cabral 

James E. Cabral Jr.
MTG Management Consultants, 
L.L.C.
1111 Third 
Avenue, Suite 2700
Seattle, WA 98101-3201
(206) 442-5010
www.mtgmc.com 
The 
information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is 
addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you 
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from 
any computer.




From: Cabral, James E.
Sent: Monday, 
June 27, 2005 3:28 PM
To: ''
Cc: 
Tom Clarke; 
Subject: RE: Record Docketing and 
Callbacks



Scott,
 
Here's what I recall, in sequential 
order:
 
1. The ReviewFiling synchronous callback 
includes
    - the time the filing was 
received by the Filing Review MDE
    - the court-assigned case 
number
    - any error messages
 

2.  The RecordDocketing includes
    - all the metadata and 
attached documents in the ReviewFiling message that is accepted by the 
clerk, as edited by the clerk
    - the court-assigned case number
    - the payment 
receipt
 
3. The RecordDocketing synchronous 
callback includes
    - the time it was 
received by the Court Record System
    - any error 
messages
 
4. The RecordDocketing asynchronous 
callback includes
    - all the metadata and attached documents in the 
RecordDocketing message, as modified by the Court Record 
System
    - the document identifiers for each 
document filed into the Court Record 
System
    - any error 
messages
 
5. The ReviewFiling asynchronous callback 
includes
    - all the metadata and attached documents in the 
RecordDocketing message, as edited by the Court Record 
System
    - the court-assigned case 
number
    - the disposition (accepted/rejected) of 
each document in the original ReviewFiling message

    - the document identifiers for each 
document filed into the Court Record 
System    - the 
payment receipt (if the court processes payments)
    - a place for error 
codes
 
I am 
unclear on a couple things:
 
1. One 
simplification would be to remove the metadata and documents from the 
callbacks.  In that case, it seems to me that we would still need to 
include a way to indicate to the filer what information the clerk or Court 
Record System changed.  Or should we just say that it their 
responsibility to download the documents and check them for 
changes?
 
2. 
Another question I have is how this all relates to service.  Since the 
service recipients receive the filing concurrently with the court, do they need 
to also receive notification of the changes the clerk or Court Record System 
make?  And should the service recipients receive the document 
identifiers for each document? Currently, we do not have a mechanism 
designed to support that.  
 
That's all I can remember.  I probably missed some 
but it should be a good start for your 
strawman. 
 
  
jim
 


From: Scott Came 
[mailto:]
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 
12:04 PM
To: Cabral, James E.
Cc: Tom Clarke; 

Subject: Record Docketing and 
Callbacks


Jim, do you have an understanding of existing consensus regarding 
what should go into the callbacks and Record Docketing message 
structure?

Tom and I would like to put a strawman forward to the list on 
this.  Can you help us build it?  My recollection is that we think we 
need only a few data items more than what's in Review 
Filing...

Thanks.
--Scott








Follow-Ups:

RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Record Docketing and Callbacks
From: "John M. Greacen" <>








[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread