Comments on WS MP

MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















legalxml-courtfiling message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Comments on WS MP




From: "Scott Came" <>
To: 
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:44:36 -0800 (PST)






Jim and TC:Apologies for not getting these comments out sooner, but I do have the following comments on the
Web Services Messaging Profile:Line 273:� The WS-I Basic Profile requires that the receiver of a message not
rely on the SOAPAction header for processing of the message.� Given that, I wonder why we are requiring that it be
used.� From an implementer's point of view, SOAPAction is generally ignored and of little value, since per WS-I BP all
information vital to processing has to be included in the SOAP Body anyway.� I recommend we rewrite section 2.5 so
that the WS MP relies only on http request/response to satisfy this profile requirement.(Similar comment
applies to lines 280-281).Line 283: I find this section confusing.� The purpose of this profile requirement is
to make sure profiles have a way of delimiting between the message and attachments, and between attachments.� All we
need to do here is refer to WS-I BP and WS-I Attachments profile, which in turn rely on SOAP 1.1 and SOAP with
Attachments.� Those specifications require MIME boundaries between the message and attachments, and between individual
attachments.� I recommend that this section be rewritten per the above to clarify it.I will be on the call from
10-10:25, and would be happy to discuss these points at that time.Thanks.--Scott












[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]