RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Results of SF face to face meeting 2-22-06

From
John Messing
Date
2006-02-23T16:24:00+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Results of SF face to face meeting 2-22-06
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















legalxml-courtfiling message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Results of SF face to face meeting 2-22-06




From: John Messing <>
To: , 
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 09:24:57 -0700






From the results document:

"Christopher Smith recommended including child support cases as a
potential for primary electronic service because non-custodial parents
are required to register with the state child support agency."   

Aren't the child support agencies a category of administrative law
bodies rather than judicial entities? Should this topic be deferred
together with other administrative law agency actions until later in the
ECF 3.x adoption process?