Re: [legalxml-econtracts] 7/22 XHTML 2.0 WD Released

We could publish it using XHTML 1 or 2 + CSS, but why try to use eContracts 
structural markup for it given that its not a contract?


John McClure wrote:
> In fact, I suggest that the TC/SC resolve that the
> document be published using the eContracts markup proposed by the report !