Re: eNotarization Markup Language (ENML) Version 1.0

Hi,

 

I am wondering why the current specification did not consider reusing party (name and address) specifications of OASIS Party Information Standard from Customer Information Quality TC? Was it ever considered and if considered, may I know the reason why it was decided not to use the specs? 

 

When many of the TCs like Election Markup language, Emergency Management and TaxXML reuse the party standards of CIQ TC, why not your specification?

 

I did not see anything that is very specific to your specs. to do with party information that cannot be implemented using CIQ Specs.

 

Promoting reusability within OASIS TC sets and sends a string and sound message to the community.

 

Regards,

 

Ram Kumar

Chair, OASIS CIQ TC