Request for Closure: RE: [legalxml-sc] IP wording in LegalXML Cou rtFiling proposal

MHonArc v2.5.2 -->

legalxml-sc message

[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]

Subject: Request for Closure: RE: [legalxml-sc] IP wording in LegalXML Cou	rtFiling proposal

From: "Bergeron, Donald L. (LNG)" <>

To: "Bergeron, Donald L. (LNG)" <>,"''" <>,"''" <>

Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 14:10:26 -0400

I believe that the change is not a substantive one and only reflects the
reality that we are not omnipotent and omnipresent. We will need an explicit
statement from a member of OASIS management, that this is a technical
clarification and that it does not affect the substance or in any way narrow
any interpretation of this clause in terms of assuring that our standards
remain open. I can live with this language as can John Greacen based on my
phone call yesterday. Dragging this out is not improving things. To push
further at this time, I believe is not a good idea.

Steering Committee - Please communicate your position by EOD. 

Karl could you draft the confirmation I am requesting?

Regards,

Don