RE: [legalxml-sc] Member Feedback

MHonArc v2.4.5 -->

















legalxml-sc message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [legalxml-sc] Member Feedback




From: "Daniel Greenwood" <>
To: "Scott McGrath" <>,<>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 15:03:15 -0400














Scott and
Fellow Steering Committee Members:

 

Thanks for
that information.  It is pretty
clear that we should cull or help get back on track any TC’s that are non-performing
and make sure that members are getting value.  My head has been down in the eContracts TC lately and I have
not been aware of the rest of LegalXML activities for the most part.  

 

My take:
the fact that nobody has got the legalxml.org web site back up after the long
weeks it has been down coupled with the near total absence of activity among
the steering committee (leading to, among other things, neglect of some of the
lagging TCs) suggests a change.  I
suggest we quickly request each LegalXML TC to appoint a member to form a newly
reconstituted LegalXML Steering Committee and I suggest that nobody who has
been on the Steering Committee for a long time accept any nomination.  New blood, new motivation and some sort
of renewed direction are what is called for now.  

 

The
current Steering Committee has done an admirable job in getting LegalXML to the
point where it is today, which is overall a strong position as I see it.  It is now time to gracefully step aside
and encourage some new people to take the lead.  

 

Thanks,

 - Dan

 

-----Original
Message-----

From: Scott McGrath
[mailto:]

Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003
2:32 PM

To:


Cc: 'James Bryce Clark'

Subject: [legalxml-sc] Member
Feedback

 

Legal
XMLers,

 

I just
received a call from a member that I think you should be aware of.

 

The CEO
of one of the (now former) LegalXML Member Section members called me regarding
his renewal in OASIS/LegalXML.  He not only reported that he will not be
renewing, but he requested a refund for last year.

 

He
reports joining specifically for the LegalXML Legislative Documents, Citations
and Messaging TC.  He reports the complete lack of activity in that area
is a big disappointment and cause for his non-renewal and refund request. 
The mail archives show 1 document in the past year, so his contention may be
correct.

 

The
company in question continues to develop and deliver products in this area
successfully without the benefit of, or in support of, the Standards you seek
to develop.  This represents a loss for your organization on several
fronts.

 

As most
customers do not come back to tell you why they are not coming back, I believe
this is unique and valuable customer feedback worthy of your attention.

 

Let me
know if you require any further details,

 

Scott…











Follow-Ups:

Is anybody out there?
From: "Daniel Greenwood" <>



References:

Member Feedback
From: "Scott McGrath" <>






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]