MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
legalxml-sc message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: [legalxml-sc] Wednesday Conference Call
From: "Bergeron, Donald L. (LNG-DAY)" <>
To: "'Winters, Roger'" <>,
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:48:48 -0500
Title: RE: [legalxml-sc] Wednesday Conference Call
Option 2
Regards,
Don
Donald L. Bergeron
Systems Designer
LexisNexis
O 937-865-1276
H 937-748-2775
M 937-672-7781
From: Winters, Roger
[mailto:]
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005
11:29 AM
To:
Subject: RE: [legalxml-sc]
Wednesday Conference Call
I am not
opposed to the meeting going forward without my or John's being on the call --
we need five to have a quorum and conduct business officially. However, John
Messing's point is well taken. Nevertheless, rescheduling a group of 8 people,
as you know, can be daunting.
So...I
pose these questions--please respond to the group when you can:
1) Do you
prefer to go ahead with the Steering Committee conference call, as scheduled?
2) If the
meeting were postponed one week, to Wednesday, January 19, 2:00 p.m. Eastern
Time (11:00 a.m. Pacific time), would you be able to participate in it?
(I would
be available to participate on January 19.)
Roger
Winters
Programs and Projects Manager
King County
Department of Judicial
Administration
-609 MS: KCC-JA-0609
Seattle, Washington 98104
V: (206) 296-7838 F: (206) 296-0906
-----Original
Message-----
From: John Messing [mailto:]
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 8:04
AM
To: Winters,Roger
Cc:
Subject: RE: [legalxml-sc]
Wednesday Conference Call
With both
Roger and John unable to attend and the relatively small
remaining membership of the SC
coupled with the importance of a number
of these issues to the
organization, I respectfully move to change the
meeting date to a time when both
can attend.
>
