From an MoU/Management Group perspective, it is not clear what differentiates this from "yet another messaging specification'
Howard Mason (via Blackberry)
Corporate IT Office
Tel: +44 1252 383129
Mob: +44 780 171 3340
Eml:
BAE Systems plc
Registered Office: 6 Carlton Gardens, London, SW1Y 5AD, UK
Registered in England & Wales No: 1470151
From: Martin Chapman <>
To: Pim van der Eijk <>; Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <>; <>
Sent: Wed Oct 27 17:11:52 2010
Subject: RE: [oasis-charter-discuss] Re: Proposed Charter for OASIS Business Document Exchange (BusDox) TC
*** WARNING ***
This message has originated outside your organisation,
either from an external partner or the Global Internet.
Keep this in mind if you answer this message.
I’m more concerned with the intention of the TC and the name of
any eventual specifications than the name of the TC itself. I think Ed asks the
most relevant question here. This TC seems to be more about protocols to exchange
documents rather than about the content of any documents. This needs
clarification.
Martin.
From: Pim van der Eijk
[mailto:]
Sent: 27 October 2010 16:55
To: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress;
Subject: RE: [oasis-charter-discuss] Re: Proposed Charter for OASIS
Business Document Exchange (BusDox) TC
Very funny. (At least, I'm assuming this is
intended to be funny. But I can't really tell, as I'm not a native
speaker of English).
You may have noted that some of the co-proposers of this
charter are native speakers of English. I will check
again, but as far as I know it was one of them that actually
proposed this abbreviation. I never questioned the
abbreviation as I only got involved in the discussions when the abbreviation
"BusDox" was already there.
FYI, there is also an OASIS DITA BusDocs SC.
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=dita-busdocs
DITA BusDocs means "DITA Enterprise Business Documents
SC"
It looks like the vast majority of the members of this SC are
native speakers of English.
A quick Internet search seems to show that BIZdocs is some
trademark, so it would violate the following TC process rule:
"The name of the TC, such name not to have been previously
used for an OASIS TC and not to include any trademarks or service marks not
owned by OASIS".
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php
I'm tempted to continue but I think I should stop here.
From: Ray
Denenberg, Library of Congress [mailto:]
Sent: 27 October 2010 17:27
To:
Subject: RE: [oasis-charter-discuss] Re: Proposed Charter for OASIS
Business Document Exchange (BusDox) TC
"they will
assume that the work of the group has something to do with buses
and then puzzle unfruitfully over what "dox" could refer
to."
I didn't have any trouble with "dox". I
assume it meant "docks" and that the spec had to do with where to
park buses.
--Ray
********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************
